Ten Days in Japan

Ten Days in Japan

By Farooq A. Kperogi

I was in Japan for a 10-day vacation (workation for my wife), which gave us an opportunity to see our first daughter, a final-year engineering student at Georgia Tech, who is doing a three-month study-abroad program at the University of Tokyo.

Apart from Tokyo, we explored the sights, sounds, and smells of major Japanese cities like Yokohama, Japan’s second-largest city; Osaka, Japan’s third-largest city; Kamakura, a historic, picturesque former capital of Japan from 1185 to 1333; and Kyoto, a former Japanese capital before Tokyo, which is acknowledged as the headquarters of Japanese culture.

Kyoto held my curiosity the most. Its imaginative mix of tradition and innovation intrigued me greatly. When we got out of the train, the part of the city we first encountered was very noticeably traditional. People were either walking or on bicycles, and homes were of traditional Japanese architecture.

But as we walked further, we saw a massive city with charming structural poetry and beautiful, expensive cars. At Kyoto University, nonetheless, we were back to seeing seemingly limitless seas of bicycles. It appears that all students and faculty members have bicycles. In fact, you can’t enter the main gate of the university (Japan’s second oldest and second-most prestigious) with anything but a bicycle or on foot. We didn’t see that at the University of Tokyo.

From Militarism to Pacifism
Before my trip to Japan, my first ideational encounter with Japan came from reading Professor Sakah Saidu Mahmud’s 1996 book titled State, Class and Underdevelopment in Nigeria and Early Meiji Japan in my final year at Bayero University, Kano, in 1996. It was a gift from the author, who taught politics and international relations in Denver, in the U.S. state of Colorado.

Japan used to be a fiercely militaristic and imperial power that either outright colonized or militarily occupied its neighbors until its defeat and occupation by the U.S. during the Second World War.

Its 1945 defeat stripped it of its empire and military power and catalyzed a new pacifist national identity. Interacting with Japanese people in Tokyo, Yokohama, Kamakura, Kyoto, and Osaka, it was hard to reconcile their history of warmongering and their current peaceableness.

What immediately strikes you as you go to any city in Japan is the ever-present, almost compulsive, obeisance of the people. Everyone bows their heads to greet. The deeper the bow, the greater the respect. I never once saw anyone shake hands or hug to greet. This seems to be broadly Asian culture.

ALSO READ  THEY ALL CONSULTED THE DARKNESS. THE DARKNESS COLLECTED THEM ALL

Ever-Present Courtesy and Obeisance
The excessive courtesy extended to us at every turn reminded me of the dutiful, submissive, oversolicitous behavior of the lower classes in Nigeria toward “big” men and women, except that in Japan, it is done with no expectation of reward, unlike in Nigeria, where such behaviors are often a symbolic act of begging.

In fact, in Japan, it is considered inappropriate, even rude, to tip anyone for their services. It will be promptly and politely returned. Maybe that’s why we never saw a beggar or a homeless person throughout our stay there.

Our daughter, who has been there longer than us and has visited a few other cities with her Japanese colleagues, said she, too, never once saw a beggar or a homeless person.

This is probably as much about Japan’s more evenly distributive prosperity as it is about its culture that is rooted in dignity and self-restraint even in the face of hardship. I heard it’s called gaman.

Japanese Don’t Say “No”
Another striking feature of Japanese culture is the premium it places on avoiding confrontation, especially for a culture that used to be militaristic until a few decades ago. Because Japanese culture values harmony, subtlety, and non-confrontation, it is rare to hear “no” among the people.

Our daughter told us that invitation letters to social events among her Japanese friends have only two options: yes or maybe. Saying “no” directly can embarrass the other person or create tension. Instead, people use indirect language, silence, or evasive phrasing to indicate “no.”

The Japanese would also rather tolerate minor inconveniences than cause another what they consider embarrassment. For instance, on their escalators in train stations, everyone automatically moves to the right so that people who are in a hurry and want to walk down the stairs can use the left side.

Sometimes, tourists (especially American tourists) unfamiliar with Japanese ways unintentionally block the left side. Japanese people almost never ask to be let through, however much in haste they might be. An American or a Nigerian would (im)politely say, “Excuse me!” in such circumstances.

To the Japanese, to complain because of a little inconvenience like that is considered being confrontational.

American Influence
It is doubtful if the Japanese have always been this averse to even the mildest hint of confrontation, given their history of militarism. It seems likely that it’s another auxiliary consequence of the American occupation and remaking of the cultural and political landscape of the country from 1945 to 1952.

ALSO READ  LOSS OF LIVES OR LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY: which is worse?

During this period, the country was led by General Douglas MacArthur, on whose watch American officials wrote a constitution for the country in 1947, which imposed democracy on the country and includes an Article 9 that says, “The Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation…”

The old militarist elites were purged, and a new civic culture emerged, which associated war and aggression with sorrow and shame rather than glory. This led to a redirection of the focus of the country from military conquest to economic development. It triggered the “Japanese economic miracle” of the 1950s–1980s.

Structural Poetry of Japanese Cities
By not spending heavily on the military, Japan channeled its resources into rebuilding its infrastructure, education, and industries. Today, the massive, sprawling, intimidatingly elegant architectural splendor of Japanese cities makes America look like one big village.

To experience sublime architectural grandeur in American cities, you go downtown. In Japan, most parts of every city look like the downtown. The structural elegance and spatial grace of Japanese cities have no equal anywhere in America.

Yet even busy, bustling parts of Tokyo with edifices of wonder, such as in Shibuya (often called the Times Square of Tokyo), are relatively quiet and subdued.

As it should be obvious by now, Japan’s greatest resource is its people. As I pointed out in my July 12, 2025, column titled “Problem of Paying Peanuts to Professors,” massive investment in public universities has been a cornerstone in Japan’s growth and continuing prosperity.

The high-growth period of the 1960s in Japan was coterminous with the rapid expansion of access to university education. In 1955, there were only 228 universities. There are now nearly 800 universities with a population of 125 million people.

This led to an explosion in student enrollment from 523,000 in 1955 to nearly three million now and the creation of a large pool of skilled labor for the country.

Were it not for the ingenuity of its people and its creative mix of tradition and innovation, Japan would have been one of the poorest, most miserable countries in the world—especially given that only about 13–20% of its national land area is cultivable.

It imports about 80% of its wheat and 90% of its soybeans, two crops that are central to its gastronomy. Most of its animal feed, which accounts for a significant proportion of meat, milk, and egg production, is also imported.

ALSO READ  Salient historical mistakes some Igbo leaders made By Prof Lawrence ETIM Discussions about Nigerian history, particularly the events leading to the Civil War and the continuing agitation for self-determination, often evoke strong emotions and divergent interpretations. While many people focus on external factors that affected the Igbo people, it is equally important to examine certain decisions and actions by prominent Igbo leaders that some critics regard as STRATEGIC ERRORS or POLITICAL MISTAKES. Whether one agrees with these assessments or not, they remain part of the broader historical debate. 1. Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe's Rejection of the Right to Secession Before Nigeria attained independence, Chief Obafemi Awolowo reportedly supported constitutional provisions that would allow any region to withdraw from the federation if it so desired. Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, however, opposed such provisions, favouring a stronger and more indivisible Nigerian federation. As a consequence, the Nigerian Constitution evolved without a recognised legal pathway for secession, making any attempt at breaking away from the federation constitutionally impermissible. Critics argue that this position reflected a lack of foresight, particularly in light of later political crises. Interestingly, many of those who advocate self-determination today, notably the Igbos, rarely attribute any responsibility to Azikiwe for supporting a constitutional framework that effectively foreclosed the option of lawful secession. Canada has a constitutional provision that guarantees the right of any region to break away through a plebescite. In 1992, a French speaking region Quebec narrowly missed the threshold score in a referendum that would have allowed it to break away. Ethiopia, former Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, St Kitts and Nevis are other examples of countries that provide constitutional rights for any of its region to break away. Critics say Nigeria missed such opportunity because of Zik's opposition during the pre-indepedence constitutional conference and public debate. 2. The January 1966 Coup and Its Perceived Ethnic Imbalance The January 15, 1966 military coup, led principally by Major Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu, remains one of the most controversial events in Nigerian history. During the coup, several prominent Northern political leaders and senior military officers were killed, while leading Igbo military officers and politicians were spared. Ojukwu himself was living in Kano but was spared. Madiebo (who would later serve as the chief of defence staff in Biafra) and many other military officers of Igbo extraction were also spared. This apparent imbalance created widespread perceptions in Northern Nigeria that the coup was ethnically motivated, regardless of the intentions of its planners. The resulting suspicion and resentment contributed significantly to the counter-coup of July 1966. Critics contend that Nzeogwu's actions unintentionally deepened ethnic divisions and destabilised the country. They further argue that many Igbo commentators have been reluctant to subject Nzeogwu's actions to the same level of criticism directed at other historical actors. 3. The taking over of power by Aguiyi-Ironsi was uncalled for. J. T. U Aguiyi-Ironsi had no business taking over power when the president, speaker of Parliament and chief Justice of the Federation where there. These were the people (in that order) stipulated by the Constitution to take over power in the event of the absence of the Prime minister. So, it was mistaken for Ironsi to take over the reigns of power. According to critics, that action also portrayed Ironsi as being sympathetic to the coup plotters. No Igbo person has ever openly criticized Ironsi for that malfeasance. 4. General Ironsi's Failure to Swiftly Prosecute the Coup Plotters Following the January 1966 coup, Major General Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi assumed power as Nigeria's Head of State. During his six-month administration, the principal coup plotters were not prosecuted or subjected to any judicial proceedings. To many Northern officers and political leaders, this appeared to validate suspicions that the new government was sympathetic to the coup's objectives. Whether justified or not, these perceptions further eroded trust in the federal government and intensified regional tensions. Critics therefore argue that Ironsi missed an important opportunity to reassure the country and restore confidence in national institutions. The Igbos have never blamed ironsi for such inertia. 5. The Introduction of a Unitary System of Government by Ironsi One of the most consequential decisions of the Ironsi administration was the promulgation of Decree No. 1, which sought to replace Nigeria's federal structure with a unitary system of government. By concentrating greater authority at the centre and reducing regional autonomy, the decree generated widespread opposition, particularly in Northern Nigeria. Critics maintain that the policy was politically ill-timed and insufficiently sensitive to Nigeria's ethnic and regional diversity. They also argue that it made any future attempt at regional self-determination more difficult by strengthening the authority of the central government. I'm not aware of any Igbo person clamouring for cessation today who had ever blamed Ironsi for promulgating such a retrogressive law, whose reverberations are still felt upto this moment. 6. Ojukwu and the Decision to Go to War History offers numerous examples of leaders who have faced scrutiny for taking their nations into unsuccessful wars. Critics often cite the example of General Leopoldo Galtieri the military president of Argentina, whose decision to engage the United Kingdom in the 1982 Falklands War led to military defeat and subsequent legal consequences. After the war, Argentina prosecuted Galtieri in a court of law and jailed him for 12 years for losing the war and bringing opprobrium to the country. Similarly, Lieutenant Colonel Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu led the Eastern Region into the Nigerian Civil War following his declaration of the Republic of Biafra in 1967. With huge propaganda machinery but little arms and ammunitions, Ojukwu dragged his people and other Easterners into a three-year period of mass suffering and death. The war ended in Biafra's defeat with immense human suffering, humongous loss of life, and severe economic devastation. Critics argue that Ojukwu should have taken responsibility for the consequences of the conflict. They further contend that many Igbo people continue to celebrate his legacy while paying comparatively little attention to his strategic errors that contributed to the catastrophic outcome. Had Ojukwu been prosecuted or even criticized for losing the war, younger generations of IPOB leaders would have been more circumspect with a lesson to learn. President Obasanjo should always be appreciated for not dragging Nigeria into a senseless war with Cameroon over Bakasi Peninsula. History will for ever remember President Jonathan for knowing that his political ambition is not worth the blood of any Nigerian. 7. Nnamdi Kanu and Contemporary Separatist Agitation In contemporary times, Nnamdi Kanu emerged as the leading figure of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), advocating the creation of an independent Biafran state. His movement has generated both support and controversy. Critics argue that aspects of the agitation, including the enforcement of Monday sit-at-home orders by various actors claiming allegiance to the cause, have inflicted substantial economic losses on businesses and communities in the South-East. They further contend that violence associated with separatist activities has disproportionately affected the very communities the movement seeks to protect. From this perspective, Kanu's leadership deserves critical scrutiny alongside criticism directed at other political actors in Nigerian history. Sadly, no Igbo person has ever openly criticized Kanu. 8. Important Igbo political leaders do not support Peter Obi presidency. Is it a big mistake that many important Igbo political leaders do not support Obi's presidential bid? For instance, the governor of Anambra State Chukwuma Charles Soludo is in the wont of declaring his anti-Obi sentiments openly, declaiming that Obi will never win. The Minister of Works Engr David Umahi does not support Obi either. Obi's public campaigns are essentially plebs-driven. Critics are wondering why Igbos do not criticize their leaders for not supporting Obi. A mature assessment of history requires the willingness to examine both external injustices and internal mistakes. No ethnic group, political movement, or historical figure is beyond criticism. Understanding the successes and failures of past leaders can provide valuable lessons for future generations and contribute to more balanced and constructive discussions about Nigeria's past, present, and future.

The ingenuity of the people ensures that they have relative food sufficiency even when they don’t grow all the food that they need.

No School Buses for Kids
I would be amiss to end this reflection without mentioning another comforting anomaly I saw throughout Japan: there are no school buses.

Children as young as six years old walk to and back from school without parental supervision. Sometimes they get on public trains and buses, which are omnipresent, timely, efficient, and cheap.

I grew up walking to school in rural Nigeria but didn’t think children would be doing that in big cities like Tokyo, Osaka, Yokohama, and so on in Japan. It speaks to the immense confidence the Japanese society has in its security.

Presenteeism and Noodle Harassment
However, although Japan seems perfect by most metrics, it’s not without its downsides. First, Japan is known for its long working hours and culture of “presenteeism” (that is, staying at work to be seen by your boss even if not working productively). Japanese work culture often extends well beyond official hours, so that people work from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. every day.

It’s one of the reasons people aren’t getting married or having children, and why the population is aging and not being replenished.

Also, although the cities are incredibly beautiful, buildings are intimidatingly imposing, and the streets are extremely neat, the lawns aren’t always manicured. Grasses either overgrow or are cut with no care for aesthetics.

And although the Japanese are prim and proper in almost everything, their eating habits can be aggravating, especially for people who have a negative reaction to loud sounds from diners. When they eat their noodles, they slurp, smack, and make noises that grate on the nerves. Foreigners call this “noodle harassment”!

In the end, though, Japan left me with the conviction that true national greatness lies in the grace of everyday discipline, dignity, and collective purpose, not noise or spectacle.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *